[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Do we have a prop-time bug?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-03-03 23:11:01 CET

Karl Fogel wrote:

>Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
>
>
>>Can anyone else reproduce this? I'm interested mainly in those who
>>have committed, because what the files appear to have in common is
>>that they are all files I have committed sometime in the past. In
>>most, but not all, cases I see that the dodgy files don't have a
>>prop-time value listed, in a few cases there is a value and it is
>>out-of-date.
>>
>>
>
>Yup. It happens for me too, and they seem to be files that I have
>committed to since I checked out this working copy.
>
Same here.

>>Next, if I run the command
>>
>>$ strace -e trace=open svn st ../svn 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep dir-prop-base
>>
>>I get a list of the dir-prop-base files that get opened. Here there
>>usually is a prop-time entry but it is out-of-date and does not
>>correspond to the timestamp on the property file file.
>>
>>
>
>Same results for me, yep. I've filed a new issue
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1162
>
>Nice catch!
>
>

Indeed. And it's not even Unix-specific. :-p

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 3 23:14:00 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.