> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marshall White [mailto:cscidork@yahoo.com]
[snip]
>
> It looks to me like one possible culprit, this funky
> "t_output_helper", is generated by SWIG.
>
You're reading my thoughts on this one. So far, if we're to change
anything, this is where I would start. However, then it becomes a matter of
how do we understand that there is indeed more than one return value, or
that a None value is permissible. You were right in that t_output_helper is
lazy, but making it work for it's dinner is going to be hard without
breaking a lot of code. Boy, talk about a nice complex issue.
> From reading I see that Dale Hirt is looking into this.
> I wish him the best of luck. Perhaps there are command line
> options for SWIG that might change
> the default behavior of this function. A very quick glance
> didn't show anything obvious though.
>
> I don't want to *duplicate* his effort, but I will look into
> this some myself. Maybe two sets of
> eyes might be better than one.
>
Any and all help is always appreciated. Like I said before, I'm a relative
newcomer to Python, Python extensions, and SWIG, so having you look also
should help a lot.
>
> Marshall
Thanks,
Dale
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 28 00:47:50 2003