Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>Robert Pluim <rpluim@bigfoot.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>Ben Collins-Sussman writes:
>> > The only thing I can think of is to do what Philip suggested about
>> > svn_client_add() -- make *all* the svn_client_foo() functions take a
>> > *list* of targets. That way everything can happen in a single RA
>> > session.
>> >
>> > Of course, what if the user runs 'svn ls URL1 URL2 URL3', and URL2
>> > happens to be a different server? Ugh.
>>
>>Well, wouldn't svn_client_ls just prompt if needed for URL2, and reuse
>>the auth stuff it's cached from URL1 for URL3?
>>
>>
>
>I think you're missing the point. There IS no more caching
>mechanism. :-)
>
>
huh? we've still go the auth baton, assuming that they used the same
client context, so why can't we cache the authentication stuff there,
keyed off of repos uuid (once we have those working anyway).
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 24 15:09:02 2003