Re: RFC: CHANGES proposal.

Greg Stein writes:
> Finally, I would point out that this is a very parallelizable activity. You
> could have one person handle the CHANGES file, and another person performing
> the rest of the RM functions. That file goes in right at the last minute, so
> that you get the right date and rev number. The test suites can be run
> independent of that final change.

Well, technically you are supposed to test the tarball -- not just the
revision. Either way its not a big deal so since everyone and their
mother apparently hates the CHANGES file I'll just deal with it.

Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Feb 22 06:08:10 2003