[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: When to use Berkeley transactions.

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-02-21 17:43:09 CET

"Glenn A. Thompson" <gthompson@cdr.net> writes:

> >(Yes, I'll volunteer to do this, but after the issue 1003 branch gets
> >merged to trunk. And after I get back from vacation, whichever comes last.)
>
> ~ How much time would this give me if I wanted to get my patch in
> before this change? Or is this change a higher priority?

I'm messing with 1003 right now. It has a couple of bugs in it, and
I've sent a mail to Bill Tutt to see how he feels about reverting a
part of his change that I don't see the need for.

As for priority, 1003 definitely has it. Part of the changes there
address existing bugs and inefficiencies in the filesystem code. As
far as I can recall, your changes don't address any run-time
brokenness -- they address theoretical / modularity issue.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 21 19:45:52 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.