[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: When to use Berkeley transactions.

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-02-21 19:40:51 CET

Glenn A. Thompson wrote:

>>
>>
>> (Yes, I'll volunteer to do this, but after the issue 1003 branch gets
>> merged to trunk. And after I get back from vacation, whichever comes
>> last.)
>>
> ~ How much time would this give me if I wanted to get my patch in
> before this change?

I can't speak for the 1003 change, but I get back from vacatoin in 10
days from now.

> Or is this change a higher priority?

It would be much better, from a coding point of view, if your change
went in first. As to priority... Well, it's likely that performance and
scalability are more important ATM than supporting SQL backends. But
it's not my call. Personally, I'd perfer to start hacking on this after
your DB backend changes are in.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 21 19:41:34 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.