Re: Checkpoint less frequently

Greg Hudson wrote:

>On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 01:50, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>
>>The BDB docs recommend having a server or monitor process that runs
>>recovery when necessary.
>>
>>
>
>I tried hunting down this reference (I've seen it before) and failed.
>If you could find it, I'd appreciate it.
>

I can't seem to find it right now, either.

>Honestly, I'm with Justin here. If it were just me making the
>decisions, I'd say that the point at which we need a monitor process is
>the point at which we should give up on using Berkeley DB, however
>painful that might be at this stage of the game. (Perhaps more
>realistically, we could try to produce a change to Berkeley DB which
>would make it actually work, and convince Sleepycat to adopt it.) I'm
>tired of passing our design errors on to the user.
>
>
I didn't mean that the user would have to start the monitor. The server
(any server) can do that itself, unles the monitor is already started.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org