Re: When to call txn_checkpoint().

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> So, would anyone object to my removing the second call? (Yes, I'm
> volunteering to do the change, run stress.pl and the test suite, etc
> :-). )

That's fine. Go for it.

> This was Greg Stein's idea during a phone call. It's possible he
> didn't know at the time what txn_checkpoint's parameters do, and might
> well prefer Solution 1 himself (I know I do, now that I've taken a
> closer look at how txn_checkpoint works).
>
> The idea is to move the txn_checkpoint() calls out of the regular FS
> code paths entirely, and instead make it a public API function of the
> Berkeley back end:
>
> svn_error_t *svn_fs_berkeley_checkpoint (const char *path,
> apr_pool_t *pool);

-1, absolutely not. The longterm goal here is to *lose*
database-specific public API calls.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 21 05:28:28 2003