Re: [PATCH] cancellation, take one

On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 20:32, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> well, in that case, if it could potentially be a problem, we don't
> *have* to use svn_delta_default_editor, we can just as easily declare
> the editor structure statically in cancel.c and return a pointer to it.
> any objections to that?

Although there are no immediately identifiable practical problems with
having libsvn_subr depend on data structures in libsvn_delta, it's still
a very bad practice in my mind.

And as I previously said, libsvn_delta is a fine place for the
cancellation editor to live. There's no reason to create circles in our
library MDD for this feature.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 18 03:41:20 2003