Karl Fogel wrote:
>
> Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> > Looking through the bite-sized issues...
> >
> > Issue 1031 (defect; bite-sized; "gcc3.3 compile warnings") is out of
> > date. Many of the warnings listed have been fixed (the
> > "uninitialised" ones anyway; not sure about the many "signed/unsigned
> > mismatch"), and many of the line numbers are now wrong. I suggest it
> > be marked "resolved: fixed" with a note if applicable that they may
> > not all have been fixed.
> >
> > Or ... If the originator or anyone can re-do the exercise and attach
> > an up-to-date list of warnings, that would be even better.
> >
> > Otherwise I'd say no further action needed until some of the
> > developers and the auto-builds have GCC 3.3 installed.
>
> Can you put a note to that effect in the issue?
Apparently not: I can edit my own issues but can't see any options for responding to other issues. Perhaps you can give me the necessary rights?
> Let's leave it open
> until 0.19 and give the originator a chance to respond, before doing
> anything else with it.
Sounds good.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 6 18:50:23 2003