[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "svn status" handling uncontrolled and non-existant files

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2003-02-03 02:44:19 CET

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:
> Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> > I tried
> > setting "Reply-to" to point back to the list in a message that I sent,
> > because I don't want to receive two copies of each reply, but the list
> > server removed it. Some people (including you, Karl) specify a
> > Reply-to which is a personal address different from the address you
> > send from, and the list server removes that too. That seems a bit
> > sub-optimal.
> Huh? Our list server is supposed to not touch Reply-to. If mine is
> getting munged, how do you know that I set it? :-) Are you sure you
> saw what you saw?

Well, I'll be darned. I just went back and looked at some posts from
me, and even though I explicitly set `Reply-to' to kfogel@collab.net
in every message I send, my posts here have no Reply-to header at all.
Apparently this is happening to others too.

Is our list software removing `Reply-to' entirely? Our goal was to
simply leave it alone, not demolish it :-).

Daniel (Rall), do you by any chance know how to check what's happening
with the mailing list software on tigris.org?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 3 03:14:44 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.