[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: why the change in the checksums

From: Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin_at_pilch-bisson.net>
Date: 2003-02-02 14:09:03 CET

Zack's eminently feasible automatic steps snipped.

I agree, and did actually think of those solutions to 2 and 3, I didn't
think of the one about setting the repos to read-only in case 1.

I merely meant to point out that there isn't a single reason why a checksum
error can occur, so we can't go blindly recovering from checksum errors.

In the long term I'd love to see something like your proposal happen, although
I can't see anyone having the time to work on it pre-1.0.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson                    http://www.pilch-bisson.net
     "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
     has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Sun Feb 2 21:12:29 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.