Re: why the change in the checksums
From: Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin_at_pilch-bisson.net>
Date: 2003-02-02 14:09:03 CET
Zack's eminently feasible automatic steps snipped.
I agree, and did actually think of those solutions to 2 and 3, I didn't
I merely meant to point out that there isn't a single reason why a checksum
In the long term I'd love to see something like your proposal happen, although
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kevin Pilch-Bisson http://www.pilch-bisson.net "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.