[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Duplicate close of file handle on WIN32

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-02-02 20:31:33 CET

rbb@rkbloom.net wrote:

>Even better than that would be to fix APR so that it registers the proper
>cleanups in this case. This still confuses me though. The problem that
>is being reported, is that we are closing the file twice. Once by the
>cleanup that APR registers, and once by the cleanup that SVN registers.
>So, what exactly is the SVN cleanup supposed to be doing? The APR cleanup
>seems to be closing the file correctly, otherwise their wouldn't be a bug
>report.
>
>

APR is doing everything right. I'll try to explain again what's happening:

On Windows, the C runtime library contains a mapping between POSIX-like
(int) file descriptors and Win32 file handles (which are effectvely
opaque poitners). It does this to maintain a (marginally) POSIX-like
environment for C programs. When you call open() on Windows, two things
happen: first, the runtime creates a Win32 file handle; next, it finds
an available slot in its fd table and returns its index. Conversely,
when you close() a fd, it frees the slot _and_ closes the underlying
Win32 handle.

Now, Neon uses the POSIX-like file I/O layer internally. This is
obviously not optimal, but it's portable. So we have to pass a fd, not a
HANDLE, to neon when calling ne_set_response_body_fd. We use the
runtime's _open_osfhandle function to assign a fd to the file handle
that APR uses internally (APR, of course, uses the Win32 handles directly).

That's all fine as far as it goes; but unfortunately, there's no
function to _un_assign a fd from it's handle. Remember, _open_osfhandle
doesn't acutlaly create a new handle, it just reserves a slot in the
runtime's fd table for an existing handle. Then, when we call close() to
free that fd, the underlying handle gets closed, too; which is bad,
because APR closes that file, too. Ouch.

Of course, we can't just leave the fd floating around, because those are
a _very_ scarce resource (each process only gets about 20 of them in the
MSVC 6.0 runtime, IIRC).

The ideal solution would be for Neon to have a pull interface, so that
instead of giving it a file descriptor, we'd give it a callback that
would read the data from wherever it's stored. Then we wouldn't have to
fiddle with the C runtime's file descriptors at all, we'd just create a
SVN stream that Neon could pull the data from.

In the absence of this solution, creating a duplicate handle seems the
safest way to avoid that bug.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Feb 2 20:32:44 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.