Re: SVNSERVE Tests Failing

On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 08:58, Philip Martin wrote:
> Yes, ra_svn is broken. I believe it is fallout from the work done for
> issue 510, see "### todo#510" in subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/editor.c.

So, I'm feeling like ra_svn is being treated as a second-class citizen
by some developers. Before and during its development, I was assured
that it would be well-received as a pre-1.0 feature, but now people seem
to feel free to check in stuff which is known to leave ra_svn broken or
which implements features in the other ra layers but not in ra_svn.

Without a lot of effort from me (which can't happen; I have to put too
much effort into my job right now), this will be a self-reinforcing
attitude. ra_svn will be the access layer which doesn't require Apache
but also doesn't work so well.

I am not pleased.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Feb 1 18:27:42 2003