[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [PATCH] Issue 898 atomic rename, implement svn_fs_rename

From: <rassilon_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2003-01-23 17:12:35 CET

I'm just going to recreate the branch from scratch and repatch the
branch with the appropriate changes. That'll make life much simpler.

Bill

----
Do you want a dangerous fugitive staying in your flat?
No.
Well, don't upset him and he'll be a nice fugitive staying in your flat.
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip@codematters.co.uk] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:21 PM
 To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
 Cc: cmpilato@collab.net
 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Issue 898 atomic rename, implement svn_fs_rename
 
 
 cmpilato@collab.net writes:
 
  I'm wondering if this discussion isn't a bit premature.
 
 It's quite possible.
 
  I'm thinking that we might come up with a more informed 
 approach after 
  we clear the iz #1003 hurdle.
 
 I'm looking at post 1003 code already :)
 
 Here's my working copy
 
 $ svn st ../svn
 M   S  ../svn/subversion/include/svn_fs.h
     S  ../svn/subversion/libsvn_fs/bdb/changes-table.c
 M   S  ../svn/subversion/libsvn_fs/dag.c
 M   S  ../svn/subversion/libsvn_fs/dag.h
 M   S  ../svn/subversion/libsvn_fs/fs.h
     S  ../svn/subversion/libsvn_fs/structure
 M   S  ../svn/subversion/libsvn_fs/tree.c
     S  ../svn/subversion/libsvn_fs/util/fs_skels.c
 M   S  ../svn/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/changes-test.c
 M   S  ../svn/subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c
 
 I switched the 'S' files from trunk to issue-1003-dev 
 creating a working copy that is essentially trunk@HEAD plus 
 the 1003 code.  Next I merged the trunk into the working copy 
 and got four conflicting files.  I resolved those manually, 
 and fixed some compiler warnings. Now it builds and the 
 regression tests pass.  I only needed to raise two new issues 
 during the process...
 
 Do you want me to check in this change?  It will mean that 
 the issue-1003-dev branch will only build if you switch 
 individual files as I have done above.  On the other hand it 
 should simplify the review and merge.  Or would you prefer a 
 patch?  It's not that big
 
 $ svn diff ../svn | diffstat 
  include/svn_fs.h               |   62 ++++++++------
  libsvn_fs/dag.c                |   21 ++++
  libsvn_fs/dag.h                |    5 +
  libsvn_fs/fs.h                 |   23 -----
  libsvn_fs/tree.c               |   98 +++++++++++++++++++---
  tests/libsvn_fs/changes-test.c |   12 --
  tests/libsvn_fs/fs-test.c      |  176 
 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
  7 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)
 
 and about half that consists of svn_error_createf format warnings.
 
 -- 
 Philip Martin
 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 14 02:09:21 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.