[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Issue 898 atomic rename, implement svn_fs_rename

From: <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2003-01-23 00:39:07 CET

Bill Tutt rassilon@lyra.org writes:

  Ahh, we do need to store a rename flag after all :) So
  where would the extra path go? In a new renames table? In
  the existing changes table?
 Before you figure exactly what data you want to store where be sure to
 check out the diff between the #1003 branch and the trunk for the
 libsvn_fs/structure file. It will show you the schema changes between
 the two branches.

Eeekk! The nightmare branch, where every file differs. Well, at
least the important files were automatically corrected.

The issue says it's ready to go, so what's the plan? Is it blocking
on a review? Is it the schema change that's the problem? I don't
know enough about the fs code to review it, but I guess I can test it.

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 14 02:07:33 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.