[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Issue 898 atomic rename, implement svn_fs_rename

From: <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2003-01-23 00:10:15 CET

Branko Œibej brane@xbc.nu writes:

 In particular, is it correct to record an add and a delete in the
 changes table?
 Ah, yes, that. I've been wondering about that myself, and it seems wrong
 to record an add and delete if we're not, in fact, doing that. I'd
 rather introduce rename-source and rename-target records; the -source
 should somehow contain the target path, and the -target should contain
 the source path, so that we can follow the rename in both directions.

Ahh, we do need to store a rename flag after all :) So where would the
extra path go? In a new renames table? In the existing changes

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 14 02:07:27 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.