Re: [PATCH] Issue 898 atomic rename, implement svn_fs_rename

Branko ÄŒibej brane@xbc.nu writes:

 In particular, is it correct to record an add and a delete in the
 changes table?
 
 Ah, yes, that. I've been wondering about that myself, and it seems wrong
 to record an add and delete if we're not, in fact, doing that. I'd
 rather introduce rename-source and rename-target records; the -source
 should somehow contain the target path, and the -target should contain
 the source path, so that we can follow the rename in both directions.

Ahh, we do need to store a rename flag after all :) So where would the
extra path go? In a new renames table? In the existing changes
table?

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org