[...]
Apache has always done this kind of thing in the default config; GET a
file with a .tar.gz extension and the response has Content-Encoding:
x-gzip, Content-Type: application/x-tar.
I think it's safest for neon to ignore anything other than the gzip
content-coding, given that the only content-coding sent in the
accept-encoding request header is gzip.
Won't that break things if somebody has a .tar.gz file that isn't in
subversion and a neon-based client tries to download it? Neon should be
uncompressing this file,
*surprised* Should it? If that is in the spec I now know who to blame for IE
behaviour I so hate. When downloading a tarball, I want to save it
as is (any clue how to run pgp/md5sum over it if it is already
decompressed before it hits my disk?).
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 14 02:05:16 2006