Re: Bug introduced over the weekend
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:22, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Received on Sat Oct 14 02:03:06 2006
this has nothing to do with using ra_svn over ssh, it's just that we
removed the svn_repos_close function recently, and you've got some
binary that's still looking for it. did you copy over a new svnserve
binary? how about all the various libraries (if you're compiling
things dynamically linked)?
Thank you and Karl for your quick response. It was indeed an
environmental issue. I make soft links to the important binaries (svn,
svnadmin and svnserve) directly from the build tree to ~/bin. This is
in order to avoid having to install stuff all over my HD and having to
deal with the commensurate lack of package management. Well, on the
server machine, I had actually made copies (or possibly hard links) of
the shell scripts instead of soft linking to them.
Once you fingered my environment, I took a closer look and quickly found
BTW, if anybody wants RH 8.0 RPMs of a recent version of neon, I've
started maintaining them:
I don't really have time to effectively keep up with the development
list here, but if someone bothers to point out when Subversion has begun
relying on a newer version of neon than I've packaged, I'll download the
new version and make a new package within a week or so.
Also, thanks a lot for adding in the ra_svn module and svn: schema. I'm
unwilling to deal with the headache of constantly insuring I have the
latest versions of apache and apxs installed. So, a version of
Subversion that doesn't rely on them actually enables me to play with it
and test it.
The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they
be properly armed. -- Alexander Hamilton
-- Eric Hopper (hopper_at_omnifarious.org http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper)=
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev