[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: eol-style bug

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-01-13 23:52:42 CET

Branko Čibej wrote:

>Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
>
>
>>Notice Bill's last commit: he set 'svn:eol-style' to a fixed 'CRLF'
>>on a handful of files -- all the .dsp files, plus a handful more.
>>
>>I ran 'svn up' and received all his propchanges.
>>
>>After the update, 'svn st' reported a handful of files as locally
>>modified:
>>
>>$ svn st
>>M subversion/bindings/com/SVN.rgs
>>M subversion/bindings/com/SVNCOM.def
>>M subversion/bindings/com/SVNCOM.idl
>>M subversion/bindings/com/SVNCOM.rc
>>M subversion/bindings/com/SVNCOMps.def
>>M subversion/bindings/com/SVNCOMps.mk
>>M subversion/bindings/com/SVNStatus.rgs
>>M subversion/bindings/com/resource.h
>>
>>
>>
>
>These shouldn't have CRLF eol-style, anyway. Since MSVC and the other
>dev tools can handle them if they're in LF, the eol-style on these files
>should be 'native'.
>
>

Let me explain: I think we should only put fixed eol-style on those
files that break things otherwise. So, the .dsp files must have CRLF
eol-style, to make sure that tarballs built on Unix will build on Windows.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 13 23:53:49 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.