Re: ANN: "Subversion - a Compelling Alternative to CVS and BitKeeper"
From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif_at_vipe.stud.technion.ac.il>
Date: 2003-01-12 09:50:11 CET
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 kbrannen@gte.net wrote:
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
That's true, but you can also work on it like CVS where a commit is:
bk ci or bk citool
(IIRC)
A bit more tedious but is working.
> Aegis is more focused on the development process,
It also has distributed changesets. How to use them - beats me - the
> and these things all affect why you see SVN as a better tool for how you
OK. I'll might mention it in my next revision.
> I hope that made sense.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
> Kevin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He who re-invents the wheel, understands much better how a wheel works.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.