Peter Davis <peter@pdavis.cx> writes:
> These all involve modification of files that would not be included in the
> actual commit, and the client would not have any false expectations about
> the contents of those files and would simply have to do an update. The
> pre-commit hook could verify this and fail otherwise.
>
> So if enforcement ever becomes an issue, hopefully it would just be enough
> to verify that none of the actual committed files are modified in the
> transaction, instead of that the transaction isn't modified at all.
Yes, technically; but I think we should accept a first-cut solution
that just blocks mods to the txn during the pre-commit hook, if
necessary... as opposed to no protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jan 11 23:08:33 2003