[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Bump of release?

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: 2003-01-10 22:30:19 CET

Greg Stein wrote:
> We have that today. The tarballs are distributed such that you build them
> and get "0.16.1 (r4276)" as the long version name. But if you get a copy of
> Subversion from source control, then it will be "0.16.1 (dev build)".
> I like the + idea, and can certainly arrange that.
> The one thing that we can't do for a dev build is have "the" revision number
> appear in the executable. As has been said many times before, when you
> build, you could have a mixed-revision working copy, so there is no single
> revision number to insert.

We've also said that most of the svn developers don't use mixed rev
working copy, probably because most people have a single commit ready
to go into the tree, run make check and then do the commit.

Also, if there were mixed rev copies, then a revision range, or just
the different revisions in the tree, could be printed, which would
imply a more complicated build.


Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>
Plots of your system's performance - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 10 22:30:59 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.