Re: CMake ?

On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 04:28:39PM +0100, Marc Haesen wrote:
> Does anyone has considered/experience with cmake (http://www.cmake.org) for
> generating makefiles and visual C++ dsp files. It seems to be a
> autoconf/automake replacement that can also generate dsp-files for visual
> C++.

It doesn't handle SWIG, and we also have some outstanding patches for our
build system to do Borland compilers and one or two others. (I forget the
set, but it was something like four more beyond Unix makefiles)

The absence of SWIG support is a big one. We've had little exposure for our
SWIG bindings because they haven't been integrated into our build very well.
I've been working on that off and on for a while now, and it is >this<
close.

I'm also not sure whether CMake supports non-recursive builds. After using
them in SVN for a year and a half, it is really great. Fast fast fast.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org