[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Using APACHE_2_0_BRANCH not HEAD was Re: recent apr change?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-01-06 20:28:04 CET

Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:

> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >
> > Feel free to also revert the commit to mod_dav_svn that calls
> > ap_lookup_provider just for that tag if you like. Or, however you'd
> > do that in subversion. I'm not really sure. =) It'd be a good
> > exercise, methinks. (Actually, how would you do this?) -- justin

I don't understand; is ap_lookup_provider *only* in httpd 2.1?

Seeing as how we're going to start changing mod_dav's pool usage, and
possibly it's API (#issue 773), I'd rather just start using 2.1 sooner
rather than later. Is yesterday's tarball of 2.1 a dangerous thing?

> i think you'd want to branch it, then check out a copy and 'svn merge
> -r
> FOO:BAR http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk' where FOO:BAR is the
> commit that introduced the part you wanted to revert.

Why branch it at all? Just run 'svn merge -r4255:4254 .; svn commit'.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 6 20:30:54 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.