Re: How much libsvn_repos wrap around the libsvn_fs
From: Michael Wood <mwood_at_its.uct.ac.za>
Date: 2003-01-03 11:12:28 CET
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 12:37:07PM +0530, Nitin Shukla wrote:
No, because the files are not stored separately in the repository as
> this would require an ACL system inherent to libsvn_fs. Probably, I
Indeed :) Concentrate on ra_dav and ra_svn instead and ignore ra_local
> ra_local really looks to be insecure by design. Does Subversion intend
Not as far as I know. As far as I am concerned, ra_local is really for
If you want to use ra_local for multi-user access, then you have to
There's no reason to do away with ra_local, just because some people
-- Michael Wood <mwood@its.uct.ac.za> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Jan 3 11:13:36 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.