[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.0 in 2006 or now?

From: Alexis Huxley <ahuxley_at_gmx.net>
Date: 2003-01-02 23:05:29 CET

On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:27:11PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:

> With all due respect to you, Perry, and Solo Turn, I think you're
> ...

> than the day before. So if you know someone who is waiting till
> Subversion reaches 1.0, and your own testimony isn't enough to
> persuade them that it's ready now, then they're probably right -- they
> need to wait until 1.0, and we need to make sure that 1.0 means what
> ...

Here here! (Or is it hear hear!?)

> Believe me, I hunger for 1.0 as much as anyone. There will no doubt

Actually, I'm very happy with the speed of release number bumping;
and if it indicates anything about the future rate then that'll make
me even happier. I'm much more in favour of the Debian and *BSD
slow bumping than the RedHat bump-a-minute approach.

Keep up the good work! And thanks again for a great product, which
I am really enjoying using.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 2 23:06:58 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.