[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.0 in 2006 or now?

From: David Summers <david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us>
Date: 2003-01-01 08:58:07 CET

On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Bob Gustafson wrote:

> If the fields were labeled (xml tagged) within the repository, then old
> fields still could exist (but be ignored by current processes) in newer
> repositories. The current data structures may change, but no data would
> drop on the floor. To access old data however, would require some special
> purpose parse code, or perhaps as an alternative to writing code, the
> dump/restore processes could be done in reverse on those repositories.

Well, last weekend I got a preliminary "svnadmin --xml dump" both as C
code changes to svnadmin and then as a perl script that eats the normal
"svnadmin dump" output and spits out XML. :-) People said there was no
use-case for it. Is this a possible use-case for it? I've not yet done
the "svnadmin load".

David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 1 08:59:00 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.