[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: guid considered premature

From: Brian Denny <brian_at_briandenny.net>
Date: 2002-12-17 07:30:08 CET

Tom Lord writes:

> But you (collectively) reply with generalisms like "a project must
> stop trying to Be Everything To Everyone" and "Subversion will not be
> a failed project". Those are great rules of thumbs, but we're not
> really making symmetric statements of opinion here. Nobody, not even
> me, is saying "fail" or "Be Everything to Everyone". I'm saying,
> here's a list of revision control issues you ought to be thinking
> about.

The generalisms that you lament are not as empty as they seem, because
they are shorthand for rationales which have been presented in this
forum before -- e.g., the rationale that there are tons of developers
(such as myself) out there who really really want a better CVS, the
sooner the better, period. From what I understand, Subversion's
raison d'etre is to be that 'better CVS'. It may not be 'better-
enough' for you, but it's sure as heck good enough for me, and I
would jump for joy to see a stable 1.0 in three months.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 17 07:28:17 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.