Whoops! Just showing my ignorance of how subversion works ;)
thanks!
donald
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:58:23AM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Donald Sharp <sharpd@cisco.com> writes:
> > What happens when a user attempts a commit, against a copy
> > of the workspace that isn't up-to-date? For example
> > suppose the copy repo has version 114. Since then
> > the main repo has gone to 116. The files that the user
> > happens to be checking in as part of the change set
> > are what were changed on 115 and 116?
>
> I'll take a stab at answering this, Justin can correct me if wrong:
>
> Since all commits are against the master, this would behave the same
> as regular Subversion would in an out-of-date situation -- the commit
> would be rejected, and the user told to update.
>
> -Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 13 16:39:59 2002