[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn diff, svn merge, and vendor branches (long)

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-12-12 07:07:01 CET

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> This is a quite radical departure from our usual hack-and-test approach,
> but really, we've done enough damage that way. let me just hint that in
> this case, the obvious solution is probably not the right one. That's
> just a hunch -- but I've regretted ignoring my hunches before.

Agreed -- that's exactly why we've put it off till post-1.0 :-).

The important question is, are we making any decisions now that
irrevocably harm our ability to implement first class change history
later?

My hunch is that we're not, but if anyone (Tom? Brane?) sees a place
where we *are*, that would be very important news right now.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 12 07:46:42 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.