[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: repository GUIDs

From: mark benedetto king <bking_at_answerfriend.com>
Date: 2002-12-12 00:01:23 CET

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 05:48:13PM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 17:43, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > I can't think of any obvious advantages or disadvantages one way or
> > the other. But I'm posting the question to the list. Maybe I'm
> > missing something obvious...
> If it's a rev 0 property, then it's available to clients through an
> existing interface. If it's a separate file, then we'll need a new
> interface. This seems like the kind of thing properties were created
> for.

I think it's reasonable to hang something like this off of
rev 0 properties, and it will be less work to do it this way
than ripple the changes through all the RA implementations.

Moving past where the UUIDs are stored in the repository,
should they be stored in the WC? I think so, since
svn switch --relocate needs to work when the original URL
is no longer valid.

It probably makes sense, then, to store the UUID associated
with every repository reference; i.e. every URL in the entries-file.
I think this will be necessary and sufficient. Am I overlooking


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 12 00:10:48 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.