[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

SV: Patch review completed.

From: Morten Ludvigsen <morten_at_2ps.dk>
Date: 2002-10-26 00:39:50 CEST

I did send a patch on the 20. about building swig bindings outside the
source tree, but as setup.py is being deprecated I think it should be
dropped in the hope that the successor will handle it :-)

Regards,

Morten Ludvigsen
2-People Software
Denmark

> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]
> Sendt: 25. oktober 2002 22:49
> Til: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Emne: Patch review completed.
>
>
> Okay. As far as I know, all pending patches are either applied,
> tossed because no longer applicable, or filed in the issue tracker
> (either as a new issue of type "PATCH", or attached to an existing
> issue).
>
> The ones in the issue tracker are up for grabs. We'll prioritize them
> according to milestones, like any other issue, of course. But in
> practice what usually happens is some committer takes an interest in a
> patch issue, applies it, and closes the issue.
>
> A few exceptions to the above:
>
> 1. Garrett Rooney had a patch reworking how errors and cancellation
> relate. His message implied that he didn't think it was ready
> for committing, though, so I haven't done anything with it. See
> http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=21716
> for more details.
>
> 2. Glenn A. Thompson is working on some large FS refactoring patch.
> He's already written up a document describing what he's doing,
> and I think he may have posted some in-progress patches, but not
> anything that he intends to be applied just yet (is that correct,
> Glenn?). So I haven't made an issue for that yet. See
> http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=22826
> for more.
>
> 3. Philip Martin posted a patch back in January (!) that reworks the
> way 'svn diff -rREV1:REV2' operates (with this patch, the client
> uses the first fetched fulltext as a base so it can fetch the
> second as a delta, instead of naively fetching two fulltexts).
> It interacts with ra_dav in a way that seems slightly suspicious
> to me, at least at first glance, but I'm not sure there's
> anything wrong. Philip, do you have any further thoughts about
> http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=10013
> and are you still waiting for feedback? :-) I will take a look
> (I know, I said that last time, but then a galaxy collided with
> the Chicago office and we spent some time on a different spiral
> arm) at the patch again, hope Greg Stein has a chance to give it
> a look re the dav stuff, too.
>
> That's it. If anyone has a patch not accounted for above, it's
> officially lost, so please repost.
>
> Thanks,
> -Karl
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 26 00:40:45 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.