Daniel, I am not deterred :-) This does sound interesting. However I
would be using the bindings in a GUI application where people
would be creating content. The Ant thing would probably be more
interesting for doing a batch building/deployment process. I have
thought of wrapping the binaries, but I don't think I could get
enough control (f.ex. a progress bar based on the dots output by svn ?!)
Anyway, I am - and will be - working on those Java/SWIG bindings :-)
Regards,
Morten Ludvigsen
2-People Software
Denmark
E-Mail: morten@2ps.dk
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: dlr@finemaltcoding.com [mailto:dlr@finemaltcoding.com]Pa vegne af
> Daniel Rall
> Sendt: 24. oktober 2002 02:44
> Til: Morten Ludvigsen
> Cc: Subversion - Dev
> Emne: Re: Introduction
>
>
> Morten, regarding your Java integration: not to deter your valiant
> SWIG/JNI efforts (!), but some of the Jakarta Ant folks mentioned
> they'd be writing a wrapper around the svn* binaries. Assuming
> they've done this already, you could leverage that Java code (Ant
> Tasks are basically JavaBeans with an additional execute() method) to
> get your own project off the ground. Don't get me wrong here, though;
> everyone wants those JNI bindings! :-)
>
> - Dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 24 07:50:10 2002