Re: [PATCH] spelling error

From: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked_at_iki.fi>
Date: 2002-10-18 00:32:47 CEST

Karl Fogel wrote:
> Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
>> A related issue, what about --non-xxx versus --nonxxx as in
>>
>> svn up --non-interactive --nonrecursive
>
> Oh, *ouch*.
>
> I suggest we go with `-' forever. That way, if we ever have an
> option like "--nonemerge", there can't be an ambiguity about which
> way the `e' binds.
>
> Anyone object?

No - but I definitely like the '-' version way more. Even if there
would be no ambiguity. So, +1 :-)

-- Naked

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 18 00:33:47 2002

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Morten Ludvigsen: "Introduction"
Previous message: Branko Čibej: "Re: [PATCH] test import of executable separately from basic import"
In reply to: Karl Fogel: "Re: [PATCH] spelling error"
Next in thread: Michael Wood: "Re: [PATCH] spelling error"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]