Re: [PATCH] Time to use APR_OS_START_USERERR?

On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:29:23PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> Back in August, Karl corrected the spelling of APR_OS_START_USERERR
> (was _USEERR), and left a compatibility #define. Subversion kept
> using the old symbol, presumably for graceful transition. There have
> been two APR releases since that time (0.9.0 and 0.9.1); I think it's
> time to start using the new symbol. But I wanted to check on the list
> first.

+1. I believe our stated minimums (not yet enforced by buildcheck.sh tho)
for APR has that change. So it should be okay to make this change. If
somebody's compile breaks, then they're simply using a version of APR that
is too old.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org