[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Upgrade to db 4.1

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-10-16 03:41:03 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:

> --On Monday, October 14, 2002 3:48 AM -0700 Greg Stein
> <gstein@lyra.org> wrote:
>
> > DB4.0 isn't all that common yet, let alone 4.1.
> >
> > IMO, the ideal situation is to allow 4.0 *or* 4.1, and tweak our
> > calls accordingly. In addition, if you're on MacOS X, then require
> > 4.1.
> >
> > So... +0 on requiring 4.1, +1 if coded as above.
>
> The fact that 4.0 isn't all the common yet I believe is all the more
> reason to just require BDB 4.1 and be done with it.

+1

In my experience, 4.0 and 4.1 are *equally* uncommon. I'd rather just
keep things simple and require 4.1.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 16 03:43:08 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.