Re: kill BK (Re: who is "we"? project goals (was: Re: Svn as a changeset engine.))

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 02:02:06PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:

> Ob Free Software Nut Comment: BitMover is actively sabotaging the
> free software community -- the community is in crisis. There are
> ethical reasons to step away from your current plans.

Actually, if talking about the Linux Kernel affair (which is the most
important one I think), you just wanted the "scalability issue" to be
removed from the 1.0 milestone. Isn't it a bit contradictory, since
the LK *IS* a huge piece of code ?

I do think that replacing BK is important for the OSS community, but
if you deliver an uncomplete (or not usable for this very important
purpose that is the LK) software, you will just increase BK supporters
("Look, OS Community cannot even make a SCM good enough for the
kernel!").

-- 
Sebastien Cevey <seb@cine7.net>
Cine7 - www.cine7.net
Milcis - www.milcis.net
ICQ: 48895760
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org