Re: pre 1.0 issues in the database

On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 13:37, Tom Lord wrote:
> 761 Usability issue (log message files)
>
> Not critical to back-end use. Fixing this certainly won't
> prevent usability complaints about 1.0 :-)

-1 on this one moving to post 1.0. I've also had this happen more times
than I care to think of. Yes, I DO have a workaround but IMNSHO, the
right thing would be to save a temp file of the message around JIC.

>
>
> 860 Performance (large files commits)
>
> Not critical to Wiki apps or to many development
> projects.

-1 on this one moving post 1.0. This I also believe ties into (as I
understand) the problem of checking in/importing a LARGE number of files
(IE 4500+) in one step. Machine runs out of memory and linux OOM killer
kicks in.

>
>
> 806 Bug fix clean-up
>
> But there's a work-around in place and
> discussion of the right solution isn't done.
>

-0 on moving to post 1.0. I personally don't 100% understand the
problem that is to be fixed but I trust the team's decision to make this
pre 1.0.

> 913 Performance tuning (import over ra_local or ra_dav on a fast connection)
>

-1 on this moving to post 1.0. For SVN to "take over" CVS repositories,
this means that imports of large sections of code will happen.

I GUESS you could sum up my response as -1 on the ENTIRE post and the
ENTIRE idea of 1.0 in 45 days. IMHO, while it is stable, I TRUST the
devel team's decision that it's not ready for 1.0 release.

-- 
Jeff Stuart <jstuart@computer-city.net>