Re: collaborating

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
> > What Subversion 1.0 will be is pretty much nailed down, at this point.
> > And I think that 1.0 will be a valuable system on its own terms. Just
> > replacing CVS, without making all of these interesting process
> > improvements, is valuable for all the organizations out there running
> > into the design limitations of CVS - working on GCC, I struggle with
> > these every day.
>
> Thanks, Zack, that's a much better way to say it.
>
> I don't think we should do a stop-and-review before 1.0. We know
> where we're going and basically how to get there. But after 1.0 is
> out the door? Sure!...

Review of the existing goals and design in parallel with the 1.0
train of development with a target of 2.0 makes a lot of sense.

Even so, I'm waiting like a crouching tiger to jump on 1.0 final. I
certainly wouldn't want it delayed -- I echo the pained sentiments of
other CVS admins and users on this list. ;-)

-- 
Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org