Re: collaborating
From: Tom Lord <lord_at_regexps.com>
Date: 2002-10-10 23:04:25 CEST
> But Subversion can't afford a drastic redesign.
First, saying "drastic" makes a presumption that may very well turn
Second, "afford" is an economic question. I believe that this effort
Third, on the question of what is "affordable" -- is that your call?
Fourth, if this were a game show, I'd wager that I could kill
> A complete rescoping at this point would be insanity, from a
In general, Don't Panic. Planning is cheap and pays off. You have
Insanity is marching into the Russian countryside in the middle of
> If you still think you can help, given the above, then great!
Right back atchya.
> But if *you* think Subversion could be redesigned to replace
I'm trying to avoid presumptions about the outcome of a
The scope I've outlined seems to fit collabnet's charter, even if not
> The recent BitKeeper license changes doesn't affect any of
No, it only effects your prospective customers, that's all.
-t
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.