[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FS refactoring.

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2002-10-08 23:40:34 CEST

On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 15:09, Greg Stein wrote:
> Gah! No way. The FS interface is the wrong level of abstraction. There is a
> lot of code in FS to handle the DAG concept, to do merging, and other
> behaviors. If you switch at the FS level, then every backend will need to
> implement that stuff.

I think there's some stuff which should move out of the FS, but probably
less than you are talking about. The FS interface is a nice
concept-oriented interface which gives you a lot of implementation
flexibility; Bill Tutt's model (as I understand it) is much more
restrictive in terms of implementation choices.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 8 23:41:12 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.