Re: svn status gets 'killed'

In a message dated: 08 Oct 2002 15:13:59 CDT
Ben Collins-Sussman said:

>> Does svn cache changes anywhere? Or does it need to check diffs
>> between each and every file in the repo and in the .svn area?
>
>Upgrade to the latest source, and we have better caching now. "svn
>status" is about 5 times faster.

Ahh, so I need to stop using the Debian packages is what you're
telling me :)

Oh hey! What if I used svn to check out the latest stuff :)
(As light dawns on Marblehead!)
>
>> [1] The size of the svn repo is > 3x the size of just the raw
>> kernel tree:
>
>The size of the repository is irrelevant. 'svn status' doesn't use
>the network.

Sorry, this is a case of mistaken terminology. The working copy I
checked out was > 3x the size of the raw kernel source tree. I
didn't mean to imply that there was network activity here.

>You want to remove extra logfiles in the repos,
>however. See all the log* files in there? db_archive will tell you
>which ones can be removed... probably most of them.

Err, okay. Any special parameters to db_archive I need?

Thanks,

-- 
Seeya,
Paul
--
	It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
   but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
	 If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org