Karl Fogel wrote:
> Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>> No. The proposal, as I understand it, is that the magic prefix
>> would be internally interpreted to mean the URL of the repo that
>> the current directory belongs to. There are plans to store the repo
>> URL and relative path separately, so this would indeed be trivial
>> to implement.
>
> Can we revisit this after that separated storage is implemented? It
> feels funny to me to be designing an interface before the foundation
> on which it will rest even exists. At the very least, we'll just
> end up revisiting the question again later, when it's possible to
> implement it, so why not skip the first iteration... :-)
Agreed. Sanity prevails, yet again.
Is there an issue filed on separating storage of the repo URL and the
current directory? And what about all the various SVNROOT suggestions?
Although, I think we can be pretty sure that somebody will mention
about this anyway :-)
-- Naked
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 7 09:18:30 2002