Re: CVS2SVN - Thoughts for RPMs?
From: Tim Moloney <moloney_at_mrsl.com>
Date: 2002-09-26 15:59:03 CEST
Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:47:08AM -0400, Tim Moloney wrote:
I haven't looked at apr/apr-util recently. I didn't realize they had
> Over time, I hope that we'll see more users of APR(UTIL), so having a
Good point. I guess that is what you'd call "planning ahead".
David Summers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tim Moloney wrote:
Ah, makes sense.
> I think that RedHat 8.0 will finally use the new Apache 2.X series so
The (null) beta does include httpd 2.0.40 so I agree. We'll find out
Note that Red Hat (null), and I assume the upcoming 8.0, did not split
I guess my scope was too limited. David and Greg are looking at the
The point I was trying to make is "If you want to minimize the
-- Tim Moloney ManTech Real-time Systems Laboratory 2015 Cattlemen Road \ / Sarasota, FL 34232 .________\(O)/________. (941) 377-6775 x208 ' ' O(.)O ' ' --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Sep 26 15:58:32 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.