[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Should we encourage --disable-shared?

From: Sander Striker <striker_at_apache.org>
Date: 2002-09-22 19:43:03 CEST

> From: Branko Cibej [mailto:brane@xbc.nu]
> Sent: 22 September 2002 19:25

> Karl Fogel wrote:
> >Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin@pilch-bisson.net> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Sander and I were discussing this on IRC today, and came to the conclusion
> >>that we should probably stop encouraging people to use --disable-shared.
> >>
> >>The only real reason for it is to make setting breakpoints (a little bit)
> >>easier. Hopefully, by this time most of our users won't have to actually gdb
> >>into the svn client.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Hmmm, also "make check" can't be run before "make install" without
> >--disable-shared, right?
> >
> Nope. Testing a shared build with in-tree libs works just fine, I've
> been sending automagic test reports for some months now.

Ben took care of INSTALL in 3199. Thanks Ben! [it was on my plate, but I hadn't
gotten round to it yet].


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Sep 22 19:32:13 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.