[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: #739: Ensuring ACID in Subversion (aka watcher procecesses are fun)

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2002-09-20 19:27:31 CEST

mark benedetto king <bking@Inquira.Com> writes:

> In effect, ra_dav -> NetBDB would *leverage* the MPM features of
> apache; the fewer times apache forks, the fewer NetBDB services
> would be required.

Really, I'd have thought you need at least one NetBDB per thread. Are
you proposing that threads share a NetBDB connection? Assuming you
really mean one per thread, how often does Apache create and destroy

Using one NetBDB per thread will dramatically increase the number of
proceses, which kind of negates any benefits of using threads instead
of processes.

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 20 19:28:17 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.