Re: file:// -> svn://

On 30/7/02 11:07 AM, "Karl Fogel" <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> wrote:

> cmpilato@red-bean.com writes:
>> I hate to say it, but I'm +1 on changing file:// to our own registered
>> (or practically-registered-by-way-of-unique-use) protocol scheme.
>
> +0 from here. It's not causing *us* a problem, right now, but we're
> violating a standard unnecessarily. Maybe it's causing confusion.

I'm +0.5, FWIW.

> How about
>
> svnlocal://path/into/repository/.../

I'm definitely +1 on svnlocal:// rather than svn:// if you do decide to
change. (Or at least something that tells you it is the 'local' svn access
method, rather than the default svn access method. You want to leave room
for svnpipe:// :) )

\x/ill :-}

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 30 17:49:23 2002