Re: "svn ls" too complex?
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2002-07-29 18:36:55 CEST
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 12:32, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Well, one of the things we don't like about CVS is that "cvs -l update"
But if, say, the -l option takes an argument in the "svn co" command and
svn -l ls co
means.
So, we have one set of options. Anything terribly complicated is
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.