Re: "svn ls" too complex?

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
> I dunno, maybe it's just a matter of our printing function. Maybe the
> default behavior should be to print dirent names, and nothing more.
> Maybe 'svn ls -v' should show the long-form listing. Then 'svn ls'
> would be more consistent with 'svn status', at least in regard to
> verbosity.

+1 :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 29 18:06:54 2002